Sociology 8390:  Sociology of Globalization

 

Fall 2004

 

Time/Place:       Friday 11:45-2:15, 1109 Social Sciences

Web Page:       http://www.soc.umn.edu/~schofer/2004soc8390/home8390.htm

 

Instructor:                     Evan Schofer

Email:                           schof007@tc.umn.edu

Phone:                          (612) 624-4075

Office:                          1127 Social Sciences

Office Hours:                Tuesday/Thursday 12:45-2:00 and by appointment

 

Introduction

 

This seminar addresses the growing literature on globalization, with an emphasis on contributions from sociology.  The course begins with important intellectual precursors, such as world-system theory and dependency theory.  Next, we will discuss the global economy and economic perspectives on globalization, touching on issues such as the international monetary system, trade, and foreign investment, as well as their implications for nation-states and sovereignty.  Then, we will examine several views from political science, some of which dispute the notion that economic globalization has significantly changed the inter-state system.  Finally, we will turn to sociological neo-institutionalism, which places heavy emphasis on trans-national association and culture, and serves as a sharp contrast with the economic focus of the broader globalization literature.  The remainder of the semester will focus on how these theories and arguments play out in particular substantive domains such as:  social movements, environmentalism, identity, and conflict.

 

 

Requirements

 

1.  Readings.  Assigned readings should be read and understood prior to class on the week they are assigned.  Completion of reading assignments is critical to understanding course material and participating in class discussion.

 

2.  Attendance and Participation.  You should attend class regularly and participate actively in class discussion.

 

3.  Assignments.  There will be several assignments over the course of the semester.  All should be completed by the deadlines specified.

 

4.  Class Discussion Leader.  Each member of the class must serve as discussion leader for one class during the semester.  The discussion leader will start the weekly discussion by introducing readings and highlighting important questions and issues.  Note:  this will contribute to your class participation grade.

 

 

Assignments

 

Short assignments

 

There will be two types of short assignments:  reading “reflection papers” and “research designs”.  These are expected to be short (about 1 page; 2 pages max.), and may be written informally (but not sloppily!).  For instance, you need not write an introduction or conclusion, but just jump straight into your ideas.  You will complete a total of 8 short assignments over the semester.  These short assignments will come in two types:

 

a.  Reading Reflection Papers.  These short assignments are an opportunity to write down a summary of readings, as well as your critical reactions.  They help you organize your thoughts and encourage you to be an active, critical reader.  You may focus on one reading in particular, or comment broadly on the readings in general.

 

b.  Research Designs.  These short papers assignments you to develop a possible research design to study a particular issue in globalization.  They develop skill at turning theoretical insights into practical, researchable problems.

 

Final Project

 

Research Proposal:  You will develop one of your research design papers into a longer, more detailed research proposal.  This may help you get started on a conference paper project, grant proposal, or even your dissertation.  (Optionally, you may instead submit a paper that involves original research.  Advanced graduate students, for instance, may use this assignment to develop their ongoing research, as long as the project is relevant to the course.  Contact me if you are interested in pursuing this option.)

 

 

Evaluation

 

Short assignments will be graded on a 4-point scale (zero, “check-minus”, “check”, or “check-plus”).  Failing to turn in a paper (or turning in an abysmal one) will result in a zero.  An acceptable, but uninspired or paper will receive a “check-minus”, worth 1 point.  A thoughtful, well done paper will receive a check (2 points).  An outstanding paper will receive a check plus (3 points).  Your “class discussion leader” performance and general course participation will be graded similarly.  These will then be converted to an A-F letter grade using a curve.  The final project will be assigned a standard letter grade (A-F).

 

Final course grades (A-F) will be calculated based on the following percentages.

 

Short Assignments        40%

Final Project                 50%

Participation                 10%

 

Your final course grade will be computed based on the percentages above.   Incompletes will not be given, except in unusual circumstances (e.g., medical emergencies, etc).

 

 

Policies Regarding Papers, Deadlines, and Extensions

 

Please type all assignments double spaced (to allow room for comments) using a reasonable font and margins (e.g. times 12).  All assignments must be printed.  Do not send email attachments or faxes.

 

Assignment deadlines are specified below.  Assignments are due at the start of class unless otherwise specified.  Short assignments will be penalized one point if they are late.  Moreover, they will not be accepted if they are more than one week late.  The final project will be penalized one partial grade (i.e., an A becomes an A-, a C+ becomes a C) for every day that the paper is overdue.  Note:  Partial days are “rounded up.”  A paper that is one-half day late is still penalized by one partial grade.  Plan ahead and start work early to allow time to complete your assignments.  Extensions will not be granted simply because people are "busy".  Assignment extensions may be arranged for legitimate reasons prior to the due date.

 

University Policies

 

Students in this course must abide by all relevant university policies, ranging from issues of personal conduct to academic issues such as plagiarism.  It is your responsibility to be aware of and abide by university policies on all topics.

 

 

Schedule and Reading Assignments

 

 

Week 1:  Introduction (Sept. 10)

 

 

Week 2:  World-System and Dependency Theory (Sept 17)

 

Chirot, Daniel and Thomas D. Hall.  1982.  World-System Theory.  Annual Review of Sociology, 8:81-106.

 

Frank, Andre G.  1969.  “The Development of Underdevelopment.”  Pp. 3-20 in Frank, Andre G.  1969.  Latin America:  Underdevelopment or Revolution.  New York, NY:  Modern Reader.

 

Wallerstein, Immanuel.  1974.  “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System:  Concepts for Comparative Analysis.”  Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16:387-415. 

 

Chase-Dunn, Christopher.  1998.  “Core and Periphery.”  Pp. 201-227 in Chase-Dunn, Christopher.  Global Formation.  Lanham, MD:  Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.

 

Chase-Dunn, Christopher.  1998.  “Reproduction of the Core/Periphery Hierarchy.”  Pp. 228-255 in Chase-Dunn, Christopher.  Global Formation.  Lanham, MD:  Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.

 

Some Empirical Studies (briefly skim):

William J. Dixon; Terry Boswell.  1996.  Dependency, Disarticulation, and Denominator Effects: Another Look at Foreign Capital Penetration, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 102, No. 2. (Sep., 1996), pp. 543-562.

 

Firebaugh, Glenn.  1996.  Does Foreign Capital Harm Poor Nations? New Estimates Based on Dixon and Boswell's Measures of Capital Penetration  The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 102, No. 2. (Sep., 1996), pp. 563-575.

 

Kentor, Jeffrey.  1998.  The Long-Term Effects of Foreign Investment Dependence on Economic Growth, 1940-1990, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 103, No. 4. (Jan., 1998), pp. 1024-1046.

 

Indra de Soysa; John R. Oneal.  1999.  Boon or Bane? Reassessing the Productivity of Foreign Direct Investment (in National Economic Growth), American Sociological Review, Vol. 64, No. 5. (Oct., 1999), pp. 766-782.

 

Barrett, Richard E. and Martin King Whyte.  1982.  Dependency Theory and Taiwan: Analysis of a Deviant Case.”  The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 87, No. 5. (Mar., 1982), pp. 1064-1089.

 

Reading Reflection Paper #1 Due

 

 

Week 3:  Economic Globalization:  Background (Sept. 24)

 

Knox, Paul and John Agnew.  1989.  Geography of the World-Economy.  London, UK:  Edward Arnold.  Chapters 6, 8 only.

 

Sassen, Saskia.  2000.  Cities in a World Economy (second edition).  Thousand Oaks, CA:  Pine Forge Press.  Chapters 1 and 7 only.

 

Brawley, Mark R.  2003.  “Is Globalization Occurring?  Assessing the Evidence.”  Pp. 75-105 in The Politics of Globalization:  Gaining Perspective, Assessing Consequences.  Peterborough, Ontario:  Broadview Press.

 

Brawley, Mark R.  2003.  “Putting Globalization in Historical Perspective.”  Pp. 177-194 in The Politics of Globalization:  Gaining Perspective, Assessing Consequences.  Peterborough, Ontario:  Broadview Press.

 

Ellwood, Wayne.  2002.  “Globalization Then and Now.”  Pp. 12-23 in The No-Nonsense Guide to Globalization.  Oxford,UK:  Verso.

 

Ellwood, Wayne.  2002.  “The Bretton Woods Trio.”  Pp. 24-37 in The No-Nonsense Guide to Globalization.  Oxford,UK:  Verso.

 

Yergin, Daniel and Joseph Stanislaw.  “Commanding Heights:  The Battle Between Government and the Marketplace that is Remaking the Modern World.”  The Globalization Reader #30.

 

 

Week 4:  Economic Globalization:  Key Issues (Oct 1)

 

Schwartz, Herman M.  2000.  “Transnational Firms:  A War of All Against All.”  Chapter 10 (p. 219-237) in States Versus Markets:  The Emergence of a Global Economy.  St. Martin’s Press.

 

Schaeffer, Robert K.  2003.  “Free Trade Agreements.”  Chapter 9 (pages 217-250) in Understanding Globalization.  Rowman and Littlefield, Inc. (2003).

 

Schaeffer, Robert K.  2003.  “Debt Crisis and Globalization.”  Chapter 5 (pp. 95-118) in Understanding Globalization.  Rowman and Littlefield, Inc. (2003).

 

Krugman, Paul R.  1993.  What Do Undergrads Need to Know About Trade?  The American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Fifth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. (May, 1993), pp. 23-26.

 

Grieco, Joseph M. and G. John Ikenberry.  2003.  “Economic Globalization and Political Backlash.”  Pp. 204-237 (Chapter 7) in State Power and World Markets:  The International Political Economy. W. W. Norton and Company.

 

Rodrik, Dani.  1997.  Sense and Nonsense in the Globalization Debate Foreign Policy, No. 107. (Summer, 1997), pp. 19-37.

 

Reading Reflection Paper #2 Due

 

 

Week 5:  Economic Globalization:  Implications for Nations (Oct 8)

 

Schwartz, Herman M.  2000.  “International Money, Capital Flows, and Domestic Politics.”  Chapter 9 (p. 197-218) in States Versus Markets:  The Emergence of a Global Economy.  St. Martin’s Press (2000).

 

Brawley, Mark R.  2003.  “Is Globalization and Domestic Politics.”  Pp. 75-105 in The Politics of Globalization:  Gaining Perspective, Assessing Consequences.  Peterborough, Ontario:  Broadview Press.

 

Krugman, Paul and Anthony J. Venables.  1995.  Globalization and the Inequality of Nations.”  The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 4. (Nov., 1995), pp. 857-880.

 

Friedman, Thomas L.  1999.  “The Golden Straightjacket.”  Chapter 5 (p. 83-93) in The Lexus and the Olive Tree.  Farrar, Straus, and Grioux.

 

Helen V. Milner and Robert O. Keohane.  1996.  “Internationalization and Domestic Politics:  An Introduction.”  Pages. 3-24 (Chapter 1) in Keohane, Robert O. and Helen V. Milner.  Internationalization and Domestic Politics.  Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press.

 

Obstfeld, Maurice.  1998.  The Global Capital Market: Benefactor or Menace? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 4. (Autumn, 1998), pp. 9-30.

 

Some Empirical Studies (briefly skim):

Alderson, Arthur S.  1999.  Explaining Deindustrialization: Globalization, Failure, or Success? American Sociological Review, Vol. 64, No. 5. (Oct., 1999), pp. 701-721.

 

Sachs, Jeffrey D. and Howard J. Shatz.  1996.  U.S. Trade with Developing Countries and Wage Inequality  The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Hundredth and Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association San Francisco, CA, January 5-7, 1996. (May, 1996), pp. 234-239.

 

Research Design #1 Due

 

 

Week 6:  Some Views From Political Science (Oct. 15)

 

Waltz, Kenneth N.  1999.  Globalization and Governance.”  PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 693-700.

 

Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye.  2001.  “Realism and Complex Interdependence.”  Pp. 20-32 in Power and Interdependence (Third Edition).  New York, NY:  Longman.

 

Robert O. Keohane; Joseph S. Nye, Jr.  2000.  Globalization: What's New? What's Not? (And So What?)  Foreign Policy, No. 118. (Spring, 2000), pp. 104-119.

 

Robert O. Keohane.  1998.  International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work?  Foreign Policy, No. 110, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge. (Spring), pp. 82-96+194.

 

Sikkink, Kathryn.  1998.  Transnational Politics, International Relations Theory, and Human Rights.”  PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 31, No. 3. (Sep., 1998), pp. 516-523.

 

Also:  Get started on readings for next week.  (This week has relatively few readings, but next week has a lot!)

 

Reading Reflection Paper #3 Due

 

 

Week 7:  Neo-Institutional Theory (Oct. 22)

 

Jepperson, Ronald L.  2002.  “The Development and Application of Sociological Neoinstitutionalism.”  Pp. 229-266 in New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, edited by Joseph Berger & Morris Zelditch, Jr. (Rowman & Littlefield, 2002).

 

Meyer, John W.  1987.  “Ontology in the Modern Western Cultural Account.”  In Thomas, George et al.  1987.  Institutional Structure Constructing State, Society, and Individual.  Newberry Park, CA:  Sage.

 

Meyer, John W.  1987.  “The World Polity and the Authority of the Nation-State”, in Thomas, George et al.  1987.  Institutional Structure Constructing State, Society, and Individual.  Newberry Park, CA:  Sage.

 

Meyer, John W., John Boli, George Thomas, and Francisco O. Ramirez.  1997.  World Society and the Nation-State.”  American Journal of Sociology.  Vol 103, 1 (July 1997): 144-181.

 

Schofer, Evan and Elizabeth McEneaney.  2003.  “Methodological Strategies and Tools for the Study of Globalization.”  Pp. 23-42 in Drori, Gili, John W. Meyer, Francisco Ramirez, and Evan Schofer.  2003.  Science in the Modern World Polity:  Institutionalization and Globalization.  Stanford, CA:  Stanford University Press.

 

Meyer, John W. and Ronald L. Jepperson.  2000.  The "Actors" of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.”  Sociological Theory, Vol. 18, No. 1. (Mar., 2000), pp. 100-120.

 

Boyle, Elizabeth H.  2001.  “International Discourse and Local Politics:  Anti-Female-Genital-Cutting Laws in Egypt, Tanzania, and the United States.”  Social Problems, 48, 4:499-523

 

Research Design #2 Due

 

 

Week 8:  International Associations and Global Social Movements (Oct. 29)

 

Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink.  1998.  “Transnational Advocacy Networks in International Relations.”  Pp. 1-38 in Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink.  1998.  Activists Beyond Borders.  Ithaca, NY:  Cornell University Press.

 

Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink.  1998.  “Human Rights Advocacy Networks in Latin America.”  Pp. 79-120 in Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink.  1998.  Activists Beyond Borders.  Ithaca, NY:  Cornell University Press.

 

Boli, John and George Thomas (eds.).  1999.  Constructing World Culture:  International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875.  Stanford, CA:  Stanford University Press.

 

Smith, Jackie.  2002.  “Globalizing Resistence:  The Battle for Seattle and the Future of Social Movements.”  Pp. 207-227 in Smith, Jackie and Hank Johnston.  2002.  Globalization and Resistance.  Lanham, MD:  Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

 

Research Design #3 Due

 

 

Week 9:  Globalization and the Environment  (Nov 5)

 

Karliner, Joshua.  1997.  “Toxic Empire:  The World Bank, Free Trade, and the Migration of Hazardous Industry.”  Joshua Karliner.  Pp. 133-167 (chapter 5) in The Corporate Planet.  Sierra Club Books.

 

Goldman, Michael.  2001.  “Constructing and Environmental State:  Eco-governmentality, and other Transnational Practices of a ‘Green’ World Bank.”  Social Problems, 48, 4:499-523

 

Meyer, John. W., David J. Frank, Ann Hironaka, Evan Schofer, and Nancy B. Tuma.  1997.  “The Structuring of a World Environmental Regime, 1870-1990.”  International Organization.  51, 4 (Autumn):  623-651.

 

Frank, David J., Ann M. Hironaka, and Evan Schofer.  2000.  “The Nation State and the Natural Environment, 1900-1995.”  American Sociological Review, 65 (Feb): 96-116.

 

Schofer, Evan and Ann Hironaka.  Forthcoming.  “World Society and Environmental Protection Outcomes.”  Social Forces.

 

Schofer, Evan and Francisco Granados.  “Environmental Policies and the National Economies:  Theories and Evidence, 1980-2000.”  Unpublished Working Paper.

 

Reading Reflection Paper #4 Due

 

 

Week 10:  TBA  (Nov. 12)

 

Class may be cancelled this week.  If class is held, reading assignments will be given well in advance.  Watch for future announcements.

 

 

Week 11:  Science/Knowledge/Rationalization/Globalization (Nov. 19)

 

Ferguson, James.  1990.  The Anti-Politics Machine:  Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho.  Cambridge, UK:  Cambridge University Press.  Parts I, II, and IX only. 

 

Scott, James C.  1998.  “Nature and Space.”  Pp. 11-52 in Seeing Like a State:  How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.  New Haven, CT:  Yale University Press.

 

Goldman, Michael.  2001.  “The Birth of a Discipline:  Producing Authoritative Green Knowledge, World Bank Style.”  Ethnography, 2, 2:191-218.

 

Drori, Gili, John W. Meyer, Francisco Ramirez, and Evan Schofer.  2003.  “World Society and the Authority and Empowerment of Science.”  Pp. 23-42 in Science in the Modern World Polity:  Institutionalization and Globalization.  Stanford, CA:  Stanford University Press.

 

Meyer, John W.  1994.  “Rationalized Environments.” [Excerpt]  Pp. 28-54 in Scott, W. R. and John W. Meyer.  1994.  Institutional Environments and Organizations.  Newbury Park:  Sage.


Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion and Sarah L. Babb.  2002.  The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed:  Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries.”  American Journal of Sociology, 108, 3:533-79.

 

First Draft of Final Paper Due

 

 

 

Week 12:  Science/Knowledge/Rationalization/Globalization (Nov 26)

 

Thanksgiving!  No Class Today.

 

 

 

Week 13:  Globalization and Identity (Dec 3)

 

Brawley, Mark R.  2003.  “Globalization and the Politics of Identity.”  Pp. 159-176 in The Politics of Globalization:  Gaining Perspective, Assessing Consequences.  Peterborough, Ontario:  Broadview Press.

 

Huntington, Samuel P.  1993.  “The Clash of Civilizations?”  Foreign Affairs, 72, 3.

 

Barber, Benjamin.  1995.  Jihad vs. McWorld.  [Excerpt]  Pp. 21-26 in Lechner, Frank J. and John Boli.  The Globalization Reader.  Malden, MA:  Blackwell Publishing.

 

Lechner, Frank L.  “Global Fundamentalism.”  [Excerpt] Pp. 338-341 in Lechner, Frank J. and John Boli.  The Globalization Reader.  Malden, MA:  Blackwell Publishing.

 

Mayer, Elizabeth Ann.  1993.  “The Fundamentalist Impact on Law, Politics, and the Constitution in Iran.”  [Excerpt] Pp. 342-349 in Lechner, Frank J. and John Boli.  The Globalization Reader.  Malden, MA:  Blackwell Publishing.

 

Hironaka, Ann.  2004.  “Ethnic Conflict in Weak States.”  Chapter 4 in Neverending Wars:  Weak States, the International Community, and the Perpetuation of Civil Wars.  Cambridge, MA:  Harvard University Press.

 

Research Design #4 Due

 

 

Week 14:  Globalization and Identity (Dec. 10)

 

Hannerz, Ulf.  1989.  “Notes on the Global Ecumene.”  Public Culture, 1, 2:66-75.

 

Appadurai, Arjun.  1990.  “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Economy.”  Theory, Culture, and Society, 7(2-3):295-310.

 

Guarnizo, Luis Eduardo and Michael Peter Smith.  1998.  “The Locations of Transnationalism.”  Pp. 3-34 in Smith, Michael Peter and Luis Eduardo Guarnizo (eds.).  1998.  Transnationalism From Below.  New Brunswick, NJ:  Transaction Publishers.

 

Hannerz, Ulf.  1991.  “Scenarios for Peripheral Cultures.”  [Excerpt] Pp331-337 in Lechner, Frank J. and John Boli.  The Globalization Reader.  Malden, MA:  Blackwell Publishing.

 

Frank, Davd J. and John W. Meyer.  2002.  The Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Post-War Period.”  Sociological Theory, 20, 1:86-105.  If you have trouble with the link, go to HERE, click on Academic Search Premier, log in, and browse to the journal.

 

Hironaka, Ann.  “Indigenous Political Activity in Latin America.”  Working Paper.

 

Boyle, Elizabeth H.  2002.  Female Genital Cutting:  Cultural Conflict in the Global Community.  Baltimore, MD:  Johns Hopkins University Press.  Chapters 1 and 2 (pp. 1-40) only

 

Final Paper Due