Sociology 219: Institutional Theories: Cultural and Phenomenological Approaches
Winter 2009, Class
#69710
Time/Place: |
Monday 9-11:50am, SSPB 4206 |
Class Web Page: |
http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~schofer/2009Soc219IT/home219IT.htm |
|
|
Instructor: |
Evan Schofer |
Office: |
SSPB 4271 |
Office Hours |
Monday 12:00-1 and by appointment |
Office Phone: |
(949) 824-1397 |
Email: |
|
Introduction
Institutional theories have become increasingly prominent across the social sciences. This course examines institutional theories, with a focus on variants emphasizing social construction and deriving from cultural and phenomenological traditions within sociology. Institutional theories, in the broadest sense, shift attention to the political, organizational, and cultural contexts that shape social life. Some institutionalisms conceptualize environments in terms of networks and resources, within which social actors are “embedded.” Others stress historically built-up structures (e.g., laws & governmental agencies) that shape and channel subsequent dynamics. More radical cultural and phenomenological variants of institutionalism argue that the core features of modern social actors, themselves, are largely products of social context, rather than existing a priori as many theories assume. This course explores the latter, in part reflecting my interests and in part because such approaches are rather non-intuitive to most sociologists and therefore require more extensive elaboration.
Link to readings (password required):
https://webfiles.uci.edu/schofer/classes/2009soc219IT/
Assignments and Evaluation
Short Assignments. There will be four short assignments, each worth 20% of your final grade (80% total).
In-Class Mini-Presentation. Each person is required to give a mini (5-minute) report on one of the “recommended” readings (or those listed in “Additional Topics of Interest”) to help expose everyone to readings beyond those that are required for the course. The presentation will count toward 10% of your final grade.
In-Class Participation. You are expected to show up contribute (positively) to class discussion. Participation counts for 10% of your final grade.
Assignments received late will be marked down one partial
grade (i.e., and A becomes an A-, C+ becomes a C) per day past the due
date. Extensions will be granted for legitimate reasons if requested in
advance – before the due date.
Your final grade will be computed based on the percentage weightings indicated. In the event of a borderline grade, I may use my discretion in adjusting grades based on course participation, improvement, and effort (or lack thereof). Incompletes will not be given, except in unusual circumstances.
General Information
Check the course web site periodically. Urgent notices may be posted on the web site (e.g., if an assignment due date were to be extended). Also, the course web page will contain important information: copies of course handouts and assignments, links to readings, etc.
Schedule & Reading
Assignments
* = recommended reading. NOT required.
Week 1: January 5
Introduction
In-class handout: Foundational Ideas from Social Psychology: Context and Conformity
Start on readings for next week!
Week 2: January 12
Sociological
Institutionalism and other “New” Institutionalisms
Jepperson, Ronald L.
1991. “Institutions,
Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism.”
Pp. 143-163 in Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio (eds.). The New
Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.
DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W. Powell. 1991.
“Introduction.” Pp. 1-38 in
Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio (eds.).
The New Institutionalism in
Organizational Analysis.
Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan. 1977. "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony." American Journal of Sociology, 83,2: 340-63.
DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48, 2: 147-60.
*Zucker, Lynne G.
“The Role if Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence.” Pp. 83-107 in Walter W. Powell and Paul J.
DiMaggio (eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.
*March, James G. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 78, No. 3 (Sep., 1984), pp. 734-749
Related Tradition: Historical Institutionalism
*Kathleen Thelen.
1999. “Historical Institutionalism in
Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science. 2: 369-404.
Related Tradition: Economic Institutionalism
*Williamson, O. 1981.
“The Economics of Organization:
The Transaction Cost Approach.” American Journal of Sociology, 87:.
*North, Douglass and B. Weingast. 1989.
“Constitutions and Commitment:
The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth Century
Week 3: MLK Day. NO CLASS:
January 19
MLK day. No Class.
Begin readings for next week.
Week 4: January 26
January 26: Short Assignment #1 Due.
Social Construction
and Institutions: An Overview
Jepperson, Ronald L. 2002. “The Development and Application of Sociological Neoinstitutionalism.” Pp. 229-266 in New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, edited by Joseph Berger & Morris Zelditch, Jr. Rowman & Littlefield.
Meyer, John W.
1988. “Society Without Culture: A Nineteenth Century Legacy.” Pp. 193-201 in Rethinking the Nineteenth Century, edited by Francisco
Ramirez.
Foundational Ideas: Phenomenology & Social Construction
Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A
Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.
Garden City,
Part II: “Society as Objective Reality.” Excerpts: 53-55, 58-62, 64-67mid, 70-82, 85-86, 88-90, 92-97, 105-108, 110-115, 121-125, 128.
Part III: “Society as Subjective Reality.” Excerpts: 129-136, 142bot-143, 145, 149, 150bot-151, 154bot-161, 164-165, 168mid-173, 175-176, 178bot-183.
*All of Parts I - III are recommended.
*Berger, Peter L. 1963. Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Chapter 3: Society in Man
Chapter 4: Man in Society
Week 5: February 2
The Social
Construction of the Individual
Meyer, John W.
1987. “The Self and the Life
Course.” In Thomas, George et al. 1987. Institutional Structure Constructing State,
Society, and Individual.
Meyer, John W. 1986. "Myths of Socialization and Personality," pp. 212-225 in T. Heller et al. (eds), Reconstructing Individualism.
Frank, David J., Bayliss Camp, and Steven A. Boutcher. “Worldwide Trends in the Criminal Regulation of Sex, 1945-2005.” Working Paper.
Frank, David J. and John W. Meyer. 2002. “The Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Postwar Period.” Sociological Theory, 20, 1:86-105.
Related Tradition: Goffman
*Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books. [excerpt]
*Goffman, Erving.
1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the
Organization of Experience.
Related Tradition: Foucault
*Focault, Michel. [1976] (1998). The History of Sexuality Vol. 1: The Will to Knowledge.
Week 6: February 9
February 9: Short Assignment #2 Due.
“Actors” and Organizations
as Cultural Constructions
Dobbin, Frank.
1994. “Cultural Models of
Organization: The Social Construction of
Rational Organizing Principles.” Pp.
117-141 in The Sociology of Culture:
Emerging Theoretical Perspectives. Edited by Diana Crane.
John Meyer and
Ronald Jepperson. 2000. "The "Actors" of Modern
Society: Cultural Rationalization and the Ongoing Expansion of Social
Agency." Sociological Theory, 18, 1: 2000: 100-120.
Meyer, John W. 2007. “Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations.” In The Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, ed. by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin-Andersson, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2007.
*Drori, Gili, John W. Meyer, and Hokyu Hwang (eds). 2006. Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change.
Drori, Meyer, Hwang: Introduction
Meyer, Drori, Hwang: Chapter 1: World Society and the Proliferation of Formal Organization
Foundational
Ideas: Ambiguity, Bounded Rationality,
and the Garbage Can
Ansell, Christopher K.
2001. “The Garbage Can Model of
Behavior.” In N. J. Smelser and Paul
Bates (eds) International Encyclopedia of
the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
http://www.polisci.berkeley.edu/faculty/bio/permanent/Ansell,C/Encyclopedia/GarbageCan.pdf
*Cohen, Michael D., James G. March, Johan P. Olsen. 1972. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 1 (Mar., 1972), pp. 1-25
*Kahneman, Daniel. “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics.”
Foundational
Ideas: Loose Coupling
*Weick, Karl E. 1976. “Educational Organizations as Loosely-Coupled Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1:1-19.
Week 7: President’s Day. NO CLASS:
February 16
Begin readings for next week.
Week 8: February
23
February 23: Short Assignment #3 Due.
The World Polity,
World Culture, and the Nation-State
Meyer, John W. 2004. “The Nation As Babbitt: How Countries Conform.” Contexts, 3, 3 (Summer):42-47.
Meyer, John W., John Boli, George Thomas, and Francisco O. Ramirez. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology. Vol 103, 1 (July 1997): 144-181.
Boli, John and George Thomas. 1999.
“INGOs and the Organization of World Culture.” Chapter 1 in Boli, John, and George M.
Thomas. Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations
since 1875.
Frank, David J., Ann M. Hironaka, and Evan Schofer. 2000. “The Nation State and the Natural Environment, 1900-1995.” American Sociological Review, 65 (Feb): 96-116.
*David Strang and John W. Meyer, "Institutional Conditions for Diffusion." Theory and Society 22 (1993): 487-511.
*Meyer, John W.
1987. “Ontology and
Rationalization in the Modern Western Cultural Account.” In Thomas, George et al. 1987. Institutional Structure Constructing State,
Society, and Individual.
*Ramirez, Francisco O., Yasemin Soysal, and Suzanne Shanahan. 1997. “The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women's Suffrage Rights, 1890 to 1990” American Sociological Review, 62, 5.
Related
Tradition: Constructivism in Political
Science
*Jepperson, Ronald L., Alexander Wendt, and Peter
Katzenstein. 1996. “Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security.” Pp.
33-78 in The Culture of National Security,
edited by Peter Katzenstein.
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. “Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Neo-institutionalism.” International Organization, 50, 2:325-347.
Intellectual
Counterpoint: Neo-Realism.
*Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory
of International Politics.
Intellectual Counterpoint: World System Theory.
Chirot, Daniel and Thomas D. Hall. 1982.
World-System Theory. Annual Review
of Sociology, 8:81-106.
Week 9: March 2
Ambiguity,
Sensemaking, and Social Construction
Hironaka, Ann. Chapter from work in progress: Tokens of Power.
Foundational ideas: The Problem of Organizational “Learning”
Fischhoff, Baruch.
1982. “For Those Condemned to Study
the Past: Heuristics and Biases in
Hindsight.” Pp. 335-354 (Chapter 23) in
Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky (eds.). 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
*Daniel A. Levinthal and James G. March. 1993. “The Myopia of Learning.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, Special Issue: Organizations, Decision Making and Strategy.
*March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen. 1975. "The Uncertainty of the Past: Organizational Learning Under Ambiguity." European Journal of Political Research, 3: 147-171.
*March, James G., Lee S. Sproull, and Michal Tamuz, "Learning from Samples of One or Fewer", Organization Science, 2 (1991) 1-13.
Some Methodological
Issues
Schneiberg, Marc and Elisabeth Clemens. 2006. “The Typical Tools for the Job: Research Strategies in Institutional Analysis,” Sociological Theory 3: 195-227.
Ronald Jepperson and John W. Meyer. Working paper. “Multi-Level Analysis versus Doctrinal Individualism:
The Use of the “Protestant Ethic Thesis” as Intellectual Ideology.”
Week 10: March 9
March 9: Short Assignment #4 Due.
Science / Knowledge / Rationalization
Drori, Gili, John W. Meyer, Francisco O. Ramirez, and Evan
Schofer. 2003. Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization.
Introduction: Science as a World Institution
Chapter 1: World Society and the Authority and Empowerment of Science
Hironaka, Ann.
2003. Science and the Environment.
Chapter 11 in Drori, Gili, John W. Meyer, Francisco O. Ramirez, and Evan
Schofer. Science in the Modern World Polity:
Institutionalization and Globalization.
Forucade Gourinchas, Marion and Sarah Babb. 2002 "The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries." American Journal of Sociology 107(9): 533-579.
*Fourcade, Marion.
2008. Economists and Societies:
Discipline and Profession in the
Related
Tradition: Science and Technology
Studies
*Donald MacKenzie.
2006. An Engine, Not a Camera:
How Financial Models Shape Markets.
Related
Tradition: Foucaulian Analyses of
Knowledge
*Foucault, Michel. 1971. The Order of Things. [excerpt]
Additional Topics
of Interest:
Education as an
Institutional Locus of Social Construction
Meyer, John W. 1977. “The Effects of Education as an Institution.” American Journal of Sociology.
Meyer, John W., Francisco O. Ramirez, David J. Frank, and
Evan Schofer. 2006. “Higher Education as an Institution.” In Gumport, P. (ed). The
Sociology of Higher Education.
Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan. 1978. “The Structure of Educational Organizations.” Pp. 78-109 in Environments and Organizations, edited by Marshall Meyer et al. Jossey-Bass.
Frank, David John, and Jay Gabler. 2006. Reconstructing the University: Worldwide
Shifts in Academia in the 20th Century.
World Culture
Boli, John, and George M. Thomas. 1999. Constructing World Culture: International
Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875.
Boli, John. 2005. “Contemporary Developments in World Culture.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 46, 5/6:383-404.
Related
Tradition: Global Culture
Robertson, Roland.
1992. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture.
National
Institutional Structures/Trajectories
Jepperson, Ronald. 2002. “Political Modernities: Disentangling Two Underlying Dimensions of Institutional Differentiation.” Sociological Theory. 20(1):61-85.
Jepperson, Ronald and John Meyer. 1991. “The Public Order
and the Construction of Formal Organizations.” In Walter W. Powell and Paul J.
DiMaggio (eds.) The New Institutionalism
in Organizational Analysis.
Schofer, Evan and Marion Fourcade Gourinchas. The Structural Contexts of Civic Engagement: Voluntary Association Membership in Comparative Perspective.” American Sociological Review, 66 (Dec): 806-828.
Fourcade, Marion and Evan Schofer. Working Paper. “The Multifaceted Nature of Civic Engagement: Forms of Political Activity in Comparative Perspective.”
Dobbin, Frank.
1997. Forging Industrial Policy: The
World Society and The Construction of Social Movements
and Change
Frank, David, Wesley
Longhofer, and Evan Schofer. 2007. “Environmental Policy Reform in
Longhofer, Wesley
and Evan Schofer. “The Origins of Environmental
Association.” Working Paper.
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2006.
"Redressing Past Human Rights Violations: Global Dimensions of
Contemporary Social Movements." Social Forces 85(1): 331-354.
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru
and Hwa Ji Shin. 2008. Global Norms, Local Activism, and Social
Movement Outcomes: Global Human Rights
and Residents of
Related Traditions: Transnational Movemements
Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond
Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics.
Smith, Jackie and Hank Johnston.
2002. Globalization and Resistance:
Transnational Dimensions of Social Movements.
Related Tradition: Framing
Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. "Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment." Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611-639.
Related Tradition: Classic Sociology of Culture
Gusfield.
Joseph. 1980. The
Culture of Public Problems:
Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order.
Conceptual and Research
Issues
Schneiberg, Marc and Elisabeth Clemens. 2006. “The Typical Tools for the Job: Research Strategies in Institutional Analysis,” Sociological Theory 3: 195-227.
Ronald Jepperson and John W. Meyer. Working paper. “Multi-Level Analysis versus Doctrinal Individualism:
The Use of the “Protestant Ethic Thesis” as Intellectual Ideology.”
Schofer, Evan and Elizabeth McEneaney. 2003.
“Methodological Strategies and Tools for the Study of
Globalization.” Chapter 2 in Drori,
Gili, John W. Meyer, Francisco O. Ramirez, and Evan Schofer. Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization.
Jepperson, Ronald L. Working Paper. “Relations Among Different Theoretical Imageries”
Schofer, Evan and Ann Hironaka. 2005. “The Effects of World Society on Environmental Protection Outcomes.” Social Forces, 84, 1:25-47.