Sociology 229: Topics in Advanced Regression
Models
Winter 2012, Class
Code: 69770
Time/Place: |
Tuesday 9:00-11:50am, SSPB 2214 |
Class Web Page: |
http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~schofer/2012soc229AR/home229AR.htm |
|
|
Instructor: |
Evan Schofer |
Office: |
SSPB 4271 |
Office Hours |
Tuesday 12:00-1:00pm and by appointment |
Office Phone: |
(949) 824-1397 |
Email: |
schofer at uci dot edu |
Introduction
The purpose of this course is to provide a broad survey of a large number of useful statistical tools for social scientists, including multinomial logistic regression, count models, event history/survival analysis, multilevel models, and models for panel data. The intent is to provide an overview of many different techniques, rather than going into great depth on any particular topic.
Online readings can be accessed via the following web link: http://webfiles.uci.edu/schofer/classes/2012soc229AR
NOTE: UCInet ID and password required. If you have never used webfiles before, you must register at webfiles.uci.edu to gain access.
Stata Software
We will be using the statistical software package Stata. It is available on machines in the computer labs in the Social Science Tower (SST 170 and SST 604). You may also purchase Stata via UCI’s Office of Information Technology (OIT).
Assignments and Evaluation
Short Assignments. There will be six short assignments, collectively worth 90% of your final grade. Most are brief exercises involving Stata, others require some writing.
Class Participation. You are expected to attend class regularly and contribute to class discussion. Class participation will count for 10% of your final grade.
This course does not
have a miderm or final exam.
Assignments received late will be marked down one partial
grade (i.e., and A becomes an A-, C+ becomes a C) per day past the due
date. Extensions will be granted for legitimate reasons if requested in
advance – before the due date.
Your final grade will be computed based on the percentage weightings indicated. In the event of a borderline grade, I may use my discretion in adjusting grades based on course participation, improvement, and effort (or lack thereof). Incompletes will not be given, except in unusual circumstances.
Schedule & Reading
Assignments
* indicates optional reading
Week 1: Introduction and Review
(January 10)
*Angrist,
Joshua D. and Jorn Steffen Pischke. 2009.
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An
Empiricists Companion.
*Long, J. Scott and Jeremy Freese. 2006.
“Introduction to Stata.” Chapter 2 in Regression Models for Categorical Dependent
Variables Using Stata (Second Edition).
Additional helpful Stata information can be found here:
http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
http://www.cpc.unc.edu/services/computer/presentations/statatutorial
*Long, J. Scott and Jeremy Freese. 2006.
“Models for Binary Outcomes.” Chapter 4 in Regression
Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata
(Second Edition).
Empirical Example:
*Kerrissey, Jasmine and Evan Schofer. Forthcoming. “Union Membership and Political Participation in the United States.” Social Forces.
Week 2: Multinomial Logistic Regression (January 17)
Long, J. Scott and Jeremy Freese. 2006. “Models for Nominal Outcomes With Case Specific Data.” Chapter 6 in Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata (Second Edition).
Empirical Examples:
McVeigh, Rory and Christian Smith.
1999. “Who Protests in
Mullen, Ann L., Kimberly A. Goyette, and Joseph A. Soares. 2003.
“Who Goes to
*Gerber, Theodore P.
2000. “Market, State, or Don’t
Know? Education,
Economic Ideology, and Voting in Contemporary
Week 3: Count Models (January
24)
Short Assignment #1 Due.
Long, J. Scott and Jeremy Freese. 2006. “Models for Count Outcomes.” Chapter 8 in Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata (Second Edition).
Empirical Examples:
Cole, Wade.
2006. “Accrediting Culture: An Analysis of Tribal and Historically
Haynie, Dana L. 2001. “Delinquent Peers Revisited: Does Network Structure Matter?” American Journal of Sociology, 106, 4:1013-1057.
*Isaac, Larry and Lars Christiansen. 2002. “How the Civil Rights Movement Revitalized Labor Militancy.” American Sociological Review, 67:722-746.
Week 4: Event History Analysis 1
(January 31)
Hironaka, Ann M.
2005. “World Patterns in Civil
War Duration.” Chapter
2 in Neverending Wars.
* Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. and
Bradford Jones. 2004. Event
History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists.
Week 5: Event History Analysis 2 (February 7)
Short Assignment #3 Due.
Box-Steffensmeier,
Janet M. and Bradford Jones. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists.
Empirical Example:
Soule, Sarah A and Susan Olzak. 2004. “When Do Movements Matter? The Politics of Contingency and the Equal Rights Amendment.” American Sociological Review, Vol. 69, No. 4. (Aug., 2004), pp. 473-497.
Week 6: Event History Analysis 3 (February 14)
Long, J. Scott, Paul D. Allison, and Robert McGinnis. 1993. “Rank Advancement in Academic Careers: Sex Differences and the Effects of Productivity.” American Sociological Review, 58, 5:703-722.
*Schofer, Evan. 2003. “The Global Institutionalization of Geological Science, 1800-1990.” American Sociological Review, 68 (Dec): 730-759.
Week 7: Multilevel
Models (February
21)
Short Assignment #4 Due.
Raudenbush, Stephen W. R and Anthony S. Bryk. 2002.
“Introduction.” Chapter 1 in
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications
and Data Analysis Methods.
Raudenbush, Stephen W. R and Anthony S. Bryk. 2002.
“Applications in Organizational Research.” Chapter 5 in Hierarchical Linear
Models: Applications and Data Analysis
Methods.
Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia and Anders Skrondal. Multilevel and Longitudinal
Modeling Using Stata.
Empirical Example:
TBA
Week 8: Multilevel
and Panel Models (February 28)
Tabanchick, Barbara G. and Linda S. Fidell. “Multilevel Linear
modeling.” 2007. Chapter 15 in Using Multivariate
Statistics (fifth edition).
Kennedy, Peter.
2003. A Guide to Econometrics (5th
Ed).
Empirical Example:
Schofer, Evan and Marion F. Gourinchas. 2001. “The Structural Contexts of Civic Engagement: Voluntary Association Membership in Comparative Perspective.” American Sociological Review, 66 (Dec): 806-828.
Week 9: Panel and Time-Series Cross-Section Models
(March 6)
Short Assignment #5 Due.
Baltagi, Badi H. 2008. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (4th Ed). John Wiley and Sons.
Beck, Nathaniel. 2001. “Time-Series Cross-Section Data: What Have We Learned in the Past Few Years?” Annual Review of Political Science, 4:271-293.
Schofer, Evan and Wesley Longhofer. 2011. “The Structural Sources of Associational Life.” American Journal of Sociology.
*Beck, Nathaniel and Jonathan N. Katz. 2009. “Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series Cross-Section Political Economy Data.” California Institute of Technology: Social Science Working Paper 1304.
*Beck, Nathaniel. 2006. “Time-Series Cross-Section Methods.” Working Paper.
*Woolridge, Jeffrey M. 2009. Introductory
Econometrics: A Modern Approach.
*Angrist,
Joshua D. and Jorn Steffen Pischke. 2009. Mostly
Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricists
Companion.
*Baltagi, Badi H. 2008. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (4th Ed). John Wiley and Sons.
*Woolridge, Jeffrey M. 2004. Econometric
Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.
Week 10: Miscellaneous Topics & Wrap up (March 13)
Short Assignment #6 Due.
Week
10 readings subject to change. (Changes will be announced
well in advance.)
Penner, Andrew and Marcel Paret. 2007. “Gender Differences in Mathematics Achievement: Exploring the Early Grades and the Extremes.” Social Science Research, 37:239-253.
Grodsky, Eric, John Robert Warren, and Demetra Kalogrides. 2009.
“